System of assessment of students during the college
Generally in most advanced schooling organizations around the world, they normally use a four-point system for assessing pupils’ knowledge, skills and abilities: “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”.
The assessment “excellent” deserves a pupil that has found comprehensive, systematic and deep knowledge, the capacity to independently perform the tasks supplied by this system, familiar with the primary and extra literature, suggested by this program. Such an evaluation also involves the mastering of this relationship between your basic principles of discipline and their significance for the obtained career.
The evaluation “good” puts the student who has got mastered the educational and program product in complete, successfully fulfills the program’s tasks, worked out of the literature that is main by this program. This is certainly, students who may have shown the systematic nature of control knowledge and it is with the capacity of self-replenishment and upgrading in the act of further scholastic work and expert activity.
The grades “satisfactory” deserve students who’s got discovered the information of this fundamental material that is educational the extent required for further training and future work with an occupation, with the capacity of performing the tasks given to because of the program, acquainted with the primary literature suggested by this program. As being a guideline, this assessment is presented to pupils who have made flaws within the response to the exam as well as in the performance regarding the exam projects, but have actually demonstrated the capability to eliminate them.
The evaluation is “unsatisfactory” when it comes to student who’s got familiarity with gaps which includes generated fundamental errors when you look at the utilization of the tasks given to by the program, this is certainly, students who is unable to carry on training or start expert tasks after graduation without additional trained in the appropriate control.
A system that is four-way assessing students’ knowledge, skills and abilities requires significant enhancement or replacement. Its primary disadvantages are: insufficient motivation for the persistence of educational and cognitive activity, since it is targeted on acquiring a minimum of knowledge (“made up” – “did perhaps not make up”); created for the reproduction of knowledge and thinking (in sessional conditions, quickly accumulated information quickly “weathered”); subjectivity within the evaluation of student’s knowledge; inconsistency with the school system, which pupils used as previous pupils, etc.
Together with the four-point old-fashioned system of assessment of pupils’ knowledge, the rating system of evaluation, which can be on the basis of the accumulation of grades for a particular period of research (module, semester, year, entire term of training) for a thorough educational and cognitive task, is now increasingly popular. The sum of the these assessments functions as an indicator that is quantitative of quality of academic and cognitive task of this student in comparison to the successes of his fellow students.
The rating system for assessing pupils’ knowledge, abilities and abilities is dependant on the following principles:
The pupil rating for a semester or year means the average arithmetic of this score for every discipline.
To implement a rating system for evaluating pupils’ knowledge, certain conditions are important: the readiness of teachers and pupils to perceive them; appropriate organizational and support that is methodological in particular, independent work of pupils is obligatory; introduction of modular training; work accounting in the shape of unique tables; application of written verification of real information, etc.